Have you encountered a court record that identifies multiple generations of descendants? Several years ago, I accepted an Ancestry ‘story’ hint for Henry Burke. This “story’ was a transcription of a Jackson county, Tennesee court document identifying the descendants of John Burke. When I finally took the time to compare the information in the court record to what I have in my file, I found that I have people in my file that are not mentioned in the court transcript. I also found some discrepancy with the FamilySearch tree. This court case connects my 2nd great grandmother Angelina Jane Burke to her grandfather. I am very thankful it was shared on Ancestry!
I’ve added the FamilySearch id and the RIN number from my genealogy file to help me keep track of these descendants.
Tennessee Courts (Jackson County)
Court Transcripts of the county, chancery and circuit courts, 1839-1915FS DGS 7642359
Image 851
Burke John G & Others vs Brooks R. V. & Others
Chancery 1884Image 852
Transcription of the Original Complaint dated July 28, 1884
in the suit John G. Burke et al. vs. R. V. Brooks et al. Chancery Court of Jackson County, Tennessee
Prepared by Robin Rankin Willis
12 March 2009Transcribed from original document preserved on TSLA Microfilm, Jackson Co., TN Roll No. 53, folder titled “Burke John G. & others vs Brooks R. V. & others, Chancery 1884.” Xerox copy made from FHL Film # 985,278.
“To William G. Crowley, Chancellor, holding the chancery Court at Gainsboro, Tennessee:
The Bill of Complaint of John G. Burke, Leonidas Darwin, William H. Darwin, Hiram C. Darwin, George C. Darwin, Mary A. Suite, Elizabeth Kelly & her husband Miles Kelly, Mary Carter & her husband William Carter, Milton E. Burke, John M. Burke, Sarah E. Hornbuckle & her husband [first name struck through] Hornbuckle, Angelina McCarry & her husband _______ McCarry, Elizabeth Padgett & her husband James Padgett, Ella Buhler & her husband Alexander Buhler, Adda Bettis & her husband William Bettis, Lucy Moore, Parazidia Lipscomb & her husband ______ Lipscomb, Permelia Lipscomb & her husband ______ Lipscomb, William L. Burke, John P. Burke, Franklin P. Burke, James P. Burke, Uhley Woollard & her husband Henry Woollard, Sally B. Burke, Francis M. Burke, Franklin P. Burke Sr., Elizabeth Simpson & her husband Thomas D. Simpson, W______ P. Hopkins, M_____ B. Hopkins, John O. Hopkins, M______ E. Hopkins & her husband Sydney Hopkins [additional interlining unreadable], Andrew L. Hopkins, Mary Ann Hopkins, Nannie B. Hopkins, John Anderson, Juda Anderson & her husband ____ Gibson?, Henry Burke, Jno R. Burke, Thomas Burke, Elizabeth Parker & Marion Burke, complainants
Against
R. V. Brooks, personally, and as
Image 853
2
Executor of the last will of Richard P. Brooks, deceased, Caleb Roberts, Josiah Roberts, Meredith Brown, & Asa Denson,
of Jackson County, Tennessee,
and Matilda Long & her husband Lane (?)
Long of the State of Kentucky,
Defts. [sic, Defendants]
Your complainants, aforesaid, complaining, state that they are heirs at law of John Burke who died intestate in Jackson County, Tennessee where he resided about the year 1842, leaving surviving him a widow named Jane Burke and the children whose names follow to wit: Henry F. [L2C9-Q3F], John G. [9H9F-QZ8], Polly [L44X-2MG], Permelia [LZGY-Q4H], William C. [? – not in FS family], James W. [LCZC-8XC], Esom L. [LC3N-F7B], Francis M. [LZLV-MPN], Parazidia [LRP7-RQP], Franklin P. [LZLV-ZZW], Elisabeth [L44X-LJT], Elvira [KCF2-963], America [9H9F-Q67], Matilda [GF3L-XZR] (not one of two Matildas listed as child of John Burke on the FS tree), Jonas [GHCY-B6M] & Jane Burke [GHCY-1FT], his only heirs at law.
Richard P. Brooks was appointed and acted as administrator of his personal estate and he has lately died and deft R. V. Brooks is his Executor appointed less than two years & six months ago. There are no debts against the estate of said John Burke.
Said John Burke the common ancestor of complainants, at his death owned several valuable
Image 854
3
tracts of land lying in Jackson County, Tennessee, on one of which he resided at the time of his death, and about 200 acres of it, the homestead, was duly allotted and assigned by the Circuit Court of said County to his said widow as her dower, and a decree of said court duly entered to that effect, and she took possession of it as such and resided on it for a considerable time and until she conveyed it or transferred it in some way as such dower and estate for her life to said Richard P. Brooks who went into possession of and held it as such during her natural life, which terminated on the ____ of _______, 1881, less than seven years before the filing of this bill; and it has been less than seven years since the right of action of the heirs of John Burke dec’d accrued for said dower land.
Said dower tract lies on the Cumberland River on the south side of it and is bounded North by Cumberland River, East by the lands of Joshua Haile Jr., South by the lands of R. A. Cox & Hoover and West by __________________
and lies in White’s Bend of said river. The lines cannot now be given by complts but reference is to be had to the lines of said dower as laid off by the Court,
Image 855
4
the records of which were destroyed & burned up some years ago without the intention or knowledge of complts.
It is believed and so charged from belief that deft Brooks or if not he some of the other claimants under his testator the defts have a copy of the decree allotting the said dower. If so let them answer as to it & produce it & file it with their answer.
Complts further allege that some time after the death of John Burke their ancestor said Richard P. Brooks the admr procured some of the heirs to join him in filing a bill or petition in the Circuit Court of Jackson County against others of the heirs to procure a sale or partition of the lands of said John Burke not covered by the dower and under it they were sold in or about the year 1843, as now remembered, by the clerk & commissioners of said Court and they were purchased in by said Richard P. Brooks or at least part of them were bought by him, including that part of the home tract not covered by the dower. There was a large quantity of the lands & quite valuable.
At the same time of the sale of the other lands outside of the dower said Richard P. Brooks fraudulently procured a pretended sale
Image 856
5
of the remainder in the land covered by said dower allotted to the widow, and pretended to purchase it in himself at the grossly inadequate price of three hundred dollars, or thereabout, although there was no application in the bill or petition to the court for a sale of it and under the law the court had no jurisdiction to sell it – the widow being then living.
The Heirs were all then young and most of them, including several of complts & their ancestors, under 21 years of age, and all ignorant in matters of law and conveyancing etc, and all relied on and confided in said Brooks, the admr., who was a shrewd person, versed in such matters, and, afterward, if not then, a lawyer.
They objected at the time of the sale, in the presence & hearing of said Brooks & others there to the sale of the dower land, and contended that there was no application to sell it; but, Brooks fraudulently & wrongfully went on and had it sold & bought it in, over their objections, and, as they now believe, & so charge, for the purpose of cheating the heirs out of it; for, among other badges of fraud, he afterward admitted to friends, at times, that he had no title to it, and that it was really the rightful property of the said heirs.
He, soon after this sale, purchased of the widow her life estate in dower and took possession
Image 857
of it as such, and held it up to her death, & to his own death about two years past, acknowledging the rights of the heirs to the remainder.
Complts charge that during the time said R. P. Brooks so held and occupied said land, he committed and permitted great waste and injury to it, and to the injury & damage of the heirs, by permitting it to dilapidate, by bad cultivation and husbandry of himself & tenants, by taking down & removing the fences & houses, etc., from it to his other lands; by cutting down & removing & deadining (?) & destroying the valuable timbers of which there was much; by destroying and permitting to be destroyed & injured the valuable orchards, to the damage of the heirs to large amounts. He also took the rents & profits of said land to large amounts, after the death of the widow, to which the heirs were entitled. And the other defts R. V. Brooks, Caleb Roberts, Josiah Roberts, Meredith Brown & Asa Denson have continued all these wrongs since, to the damage of the heirs. But the amounts of the rents & damages for which each or any of them is liable cannot be stated or ascertained without an accounti[ng] thereof; it being a matter of complicated account, fit, & fit only, to be ascertained by a court of chancery, and not fit or considerable in a court
[remainder of this page is missing. The complainants are just asserting that the case must be tried in the chancery court, that the county court of law doesn’t have jurisdiction.]
Image 858
They all claim under the title of John Burke the common ancestor of complts whose title papers are supposed to be in possession of deft Brooks, or if they are not they are so unintentionally lost or mislaid or destroyed that complts cannot find them & that the registration of them is also so unintentionally destroyed.
Said R. V. Brooks, Caleb Roberts, Nathan Roberts, Josiah Roberts, Meredith Brown & Asa Denson are the present occupants of said land, and claim it wrongfully, and refuse to give it up or, surrender the possession of it to the heirs of said John Burke, dec’d, or pay the rents & damages; though the heirs have duly demanded the same of them, and said rents and damages, with the interest thereon, are due and unpaid to the heirs. Your complainants are informed & believe, and, so, charge, that Richard P. Brooks did not pay any thing for the said remainder interest in the land covered by said dower; and, therefore, he is not entitled in any event to any reimbursement. Yet, if it turn out that any of the heirs did in fact get any part of its proceeds, they are, respectively, willing to refund it & do justice, upon the land being surrendered or decreed to be given up to them; and they have offered this to the present occupants. But they refuse, as aforesaid, to surrender & pay. So, complts must sue for their rights.
Image 859
At the death of said John Burke [LRY8-LK7] {RIN10238} the ancestor of [complts] his said lands descended to his aforesaid children, then living, equally. After his death some of them died and some of them died leaving issue who inherit through them [their] portions of said lands, and they are as follow: Polly, a daughter [L44X-2MG] {RIN10240}of said John the common ancestor, married William Darwin [KHSW-CBG] {RIN10252}, and died leaving children to wit: Leonidas Darwin [L56W-6M4] {RIN 10253} of Texas, William H. Darwin [LHPF-5XF] {RIN 10254} of Arkansas, Hiram C. Darwin ][LH2Y-PBV] {RIN 10255} of Texas, George C. Darwin [L75M-SWF] {RIN 10256} of Jackson County, Tennessee, Mary A [MTLD-X5Q] {RIN 10257]a daughter who married a man by a name of [Suite], but he is dead and she is a widow & resides in Texas; Elizabeth [MTLD-XT7] {RIN 10258}, who married Miles Kelly, and they reside in Kansas, Granville Darwin [LHPF-5K3] {RIN 10259} who died leaving one daughter Mary {RIN 10264} who has married Carter & they reside in Jackson County, Tennessee Parasidia [KC52-38W] {RIN 10260} a daughter, who married Alexander Taylor & they reside in Arkansas and Polly [L84Z-3WP]{RIN 10261} a daughter who died without issue after her mother died and her share descended to her brothers and sisters the children of Polly Darwin, aforesaid equally.
Henry F. Burke [L2C9-Q3F] {RIN 518}, a son of the Common ancestor, died about Nov. 1845 leaving four children, to wit: Milton E. Burke {RIN 556}, John M. Burke {RIN 559}, Sarah E. {RIN 557} a daughter who has married _ Hornbuckle, all of the state of Missouri and Angelina {RIN 516}, a daughter who has married
page 860
_ MCary who reside in KansasParasidia, [possibly LRP7-RQP] {RIN 10241} a daughter of the common ancestor, married W. W. [Slone] (probably William Washington Moore [LRP7-LBY] {10267}and not Slone) and afterward died intestate leaving the following children, to wit: Elisabeth [likely L2SH-DH4], a daughter, who has married James Pudgett [LV6M-9ZW] of Wilson County, Tennessee; Ella [M18V-LXM], a daughter who has married Alexander Buhler of Wilson County, Tennessee; Adda [KG72-YYB], a daughter who has married William Bellis of Wilson County, Tennessee & Lucy Moore [MTLD-F3R], a daughter of Wilson County, Tennessee;
Permelia [LZGY-Q4H] {RIN10269}, a daughter of the common ancestor, married Alva Graves, and they are both dead leaving two children, daughter, to wit, Parasidia [9K8M-98D] {RIN 10271}, who married Lipscomb, and Permelia [LTGP-Q47] {RIN 10272}, who married Lipscomb, all of the state of Missouri.
Esom S [LC3N=F7B] {RIN10242}, a son of the common ancestor died leaving the following children, all of whom reside in Wilson County, Tennessee, to wit: William L.[LWM4-T7M] {RIN 10275}, John P. [MTLD-XDH] {RIN 10276}, Franklin P. [MTLD-XXM] {RIN 10277} & James B Burke [L4HC-2GL] {RIN 10278} sons and two daughters, to wit Uhley [MTLD-XXC] {RIN 11895}, now wife of Henry Wooland and Sallie B. Burke [MTLD-XDB] {RIN 10280}, the said F. P. Sallie B. & Jas. R are [minors] without guardians and [sue] by the[ir]
The following children of the common ancestor are living to wit John G [9H9F-QZ8] {RIN 10243} of Wilson County, Tenn, of Texas, Franklin P. [LZL-ZZW]{RIN 10244} of Missouri, sons & Elizabeth [L44X-LJT] {RIN 10246} the wife of Thomas D. Simpson of Texas, and Matilda [possibly GF3L-XZR] {RIN 10247}, the wife of Lone Long [possible Bennett Robert Long KF5J-6NJ], of Kentucky.
Elvira [KCF2-963] {RIN 10248}, a daughter of the common ancestor, married Otey Hopkins and died, leaving the following children, [hereby] heirs
image 861
to wit: W. P. M D [27GD-6M1], John O. [27GX-35P], M E. [27GD-Z2D], Sydney [LZDR-VF6], Andrew L. [27G6-PXH], Nannie B. [27G6-PFH], & Mary Ann Hopkins [27G6-BX8], Sidney Hopkins [LZDR-VF6], Andrue Hopkins [27G6-PXH], Nancy B. [27G6-PFH] Hopkins & Mary Jane Hopkins (John Anderson & Frances) Anderson [never] who [sue] by those next found George C. DarwinAmerica, a daughter of the common ancestor [possibly 9H9F-Q67] {RIN 10249}, married _ Anderson, and died, leaving the following children surviving her, to wit: Judy & John Anderson, who reside in Jackson County, Tennessee.
James B. Burke [LCZC-8XC] {RIN 10250}, son of the common ancestor, who died, leaving the following children therein to wit: Jno R. Burke [9KBF-XTV] {RIN 10296}, Thos. Burke [27C7-5XR] {RIN 10297}, Elizabeth Parker [KGPD-L3Z] {RIN 10298}, widow of _ Parker and Marion Burke [278F-F14] {RIN10299}, citizen of the state of Kentucky.
Wm. C. Burke {RIN 10251}, son of the common ancestor, who died leaving one child thus Henry Burk, a citizen of the state of Kentucky.
The common ancestor had one son named Jonas[LL74-M1D] {RIN 10302} at his death and a daughter born in lawful time a few months after his death whose name was Jane [GHCY-1FT] {RIN 10303}, as now remembered, who both died intestate & without marriage or issue many years ago, before the death of the widow and their shares descended to the other surviving heirs of the common ancestor to wit those herein seated in the same proportions as the other parts of the estate descended to them from said common ancestor.
Image 862
Your complts further state that the said land [sued] for is not susceptible of partitions among the owners of it owing to the number of owners being so great, for want of timber & water and being bounded & [?] by adjacent owners lands and by the natural obstructions so that roads & ways for ingress & egress could not be had to & from it by reason of all which & perhaps other good reasons the value could be such diminished so that it is not susceptible of such partition in kind without manifest injury to the owners and it would be manifestly to the interest & advantage of the owners that the lands be sold and the proceed partitioned among them.
image 863
said court, on behalf of the complets and of said Matilda Long & Her husband, if they shall choose to avail themselves of its benefits under the rules of law & practice; that the persons named in the cap[tion] as defendants be made such by proper process & orders of publication &c that they be compelled to answer fully but not on oath; that they answer as to the said [copy] of the deceased & other title papers aforesaid and fiel them with their answers if they have them that from hearing decrees be entered declaring the rights & title of complts & [?] & wife and setling up their title to be completes into said lands and vesting the same in them according to their several rights and that they be put in possession thereof; that the defts in possession & claiming the lands be held liable for the rents, waste & damages of the lands with interest therein that deft R. V. Brooks as Executor of the will of said Richard P. Brooks, deceased and the estate of said Richard P. Brooks be held liable also for the same; that all proper & Necessary accounts thereof be taken and reports made and all proper & necessary decrees entered to declare & enforce the rights of said heirs or if complts have mistaken their relief that such other or further relief be granted them as may seem right & lawful.
As the rental is quite valuable and some of the defendants not solvent complts pray that a receiver be appointed to rent out the lands
image 864
and secure the rents pending the litigation and such orders made & proceedins h[eld] as may be necessary & proper.
Complts also pray that defts be injoined from committing further waste or damage to the lands.
This is the first application for an injunction in this matter.
A. A. Swope / Solors for complts
D. A. [Witt]State of Tennessee
Jackson County
Personally appeared before me H W [Weem] clerk [mend] of the court of said county G. C. Darwin Jr one of the complainants in the foregoing bill and made oath that the facts stated in said bill are true as stated according to his information & belief. And those allegation made from information he believes to be true & subscribed his [offedence] before me on the 28th day of July 1884
G. C. Darwin
Swort to
[?] [He] W Williams Clrk
Below are images of a descendancy report from my genealogy file. Names highlighted in yellow are named in the court document.
